| |
NL1VKL > BBS 26.12.20 22:01l 83 Lines 3237 Bytes #999 (0) @ EU
BID : 30695NL1VKL
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: F6FBB 7.0.10 fuer CB Calls/disable buildin Callfitering
Path: FU0BOX<CB0ESN<BLM274<DBX320<DBX233<VB1BOX<NL3VKL
Sent: 201226/2037Z @:NL3VKL.NBO.NLD.EU #:64114 [Uden] $:30695NL1VKL
From: NL1VKL@NL3VKL.NBO.NLD.EU
To : BBS@EU
Message from: NL1VKL@NL3VKL
Quoting from a previous message...
> Message from: NL1VKL@NL3VKL
>
> Quoting from a previous message...
>
>
> Hello Manuel,
>
> Let me introduce myself... My name is Dave de NL1VKL and I'm one of the
> current active maintainers of LinFBB.
>
> Very recently, actually yesterday, I also had this kind of a question from
> one of the Dutch stations. I'm going to check what and how things are
> implemented as I don't have any connection problems with my own setup. I
> think there's already an option which disables callsign validation
> (completely.. which I might did already in the past). Although I still
have
> to take a look at it.
>
> If there's a change needed I'll guarantee we'll figure something out and
> upload it to the SVN repo for testing. We also have to take the HAM radio
> rules in account and therefore I think it will be a configurable
> parameter/flag if needed / not present already.
>
> That said... Another thing:
>
> It's highly inadvisable to advice others to change source at your own.
> Supporting modified versions can be a pain in the ass for us as
maintainers.
> Users can (and will) report bugs to modified versions to us maintainers,
> while we don't know it's a modified version they're using and what
> modifications are done to it. A lot of issues are (newly) introduced with
> modifications of users themselves. I'm not saying this one is good, bad or
> something else in between. And yes it's open-source... But please take in
> account us as maintainers before posting such mods to the public.
>
> It's not a situation we're opting for and would therefore ask users who
> think things need to be done different, or have a bug-report, to subscribe
> to the mailing list or create a ticket @ LinFBB's Sourceforge page with
your
> question or bug report.
>
> This one is already on the radar and will be investigated and solved soon.
> Keep an eye on the SVN code repository @ Sourceforce or wait until the
next
> release version 7.0.11.
>
> Thanks.
>
> 73! Dave de NL1VKL
>
I just did a quick compare with a default FBB config file against mine.
I think adding the value 4096 to the current value of the 'fbbfwd' parameter
would might be sufficient to make callsign validation less strict.
Also agree on the fact it's not the most obvious place for configuring this,
but I think that's the key here without modification needed. Didn't test it
(yet) but as said earlier I'm not having any issues and I have this
particular flag set.
73! Dave de NL1VKL
====================================================================
_____ __ ___ _____ _____ __
| | | | |_ | | | | | | | Sysop: Dave
| | | | |__ _| |_| | | -| |__ QTH: Uden - JO21TP
|_|___|_____|_____|\___/|__|__|_____| BBS: NL3VKL.NBO.NLD.EU
QRV: 27.235 MHz (FM 1200bps)
NL3VKL BBS
NL5VKL Net/Rom node / internet gateway https://nl5vkl.mijndingen.nl
====================================================================
** This message is generated with Sally 7.2.042
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lese vorherige Mail | Lese naechste Mail
| |
